“Test Optional” students: Do they really belong here?
Questioning whether the class of 2025 got the easy way out
November 23, 2021
The other day I was eating dinner with my friends at d-hall when I caught sight of a freshman getting an ice cream from the soft serve machine. The young man filled the cone in a zig-zag rather than a circular motion, forming a rectangular prism rather than a conical swirl of ice cream.
As he pulled the lever to stop filling the cone in his unorthodox, rather idiotic manner, the ice cream toppled off the cone and splattered on the floor. “That screams test optional,” I said to my friends, who practically choked on their food from laughing. I didn’t even laugh; I’m so acclimated to making fun of freshmen with that joke.
But the irony is that I’m a freshman -a test optional freshman- just like that imbecile in the dining hall.
So why do I make that joke if it applies to myself too? Well, number one, I can make that joke because I am “test-optional.” Number two, undeserving high schoolers weasel their ways through universities’ admissions councils every year- and I’m not just talking about Washington and Lee University.
Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, testing sites for College Board’s standardized testing, most notably the SAT and ACT, were closed. Although some high school juniors had already taken these tests, most did not get the opportunity to do so. As a result, virtually all universities across the nation announced that they would not require students of the graduating college class of 2025 to submit test scores, including the SAT, ACT, and other less important tests such as SAT subject tests.
The idea of not requiring a standardized test was radical and, for the most part, unprecedented. Not only did older students spend countless hours and dollars on courses to prepare for these exams, but also had to forgo time dedicated to strengthening other parts of their application, such as GPA and extracurriculars. How could the class of 2025 get away with this unfair advantage?
I absolutely agree with the fact that some students are undeserving of their acceptance to Washington and Lee, but that notion definitely does not apply to the entire test optional class; in fact, this statement may be applied to all undergraduate classes across the entire country’s colleges and universities.
Each year, committed student athletes get the upper hand when applying to college. Typically, these individuals get the OK from admissions stating that they will be accepted- even if their application does not come close to that of a NARP (non-athletic regular person), whose resumé is filled with perfect markings, extracurriculars and volunteer hours – simply because they have a good arm or can run really fast. While this phenomenon may not apply to many DIII colleges, it certainly does for upper division schools that offer athletic scholarships.
There are plenty of other ways in which students receive acceptance, even when they are academically unqualified. (Not to bring up the elephant in the room at the school with the nation’s most strict honor system, but…) hundreds of high school students are master cheaters- especially with virtual schooling- and somehow go all four years without getting caught. As a result, these students have absurdly high GPAs, making admissions counselors nod their heads in delight when seeing their transcripts. Ah, Joe Schmo looks like a hard worker and a perfect addition to our campus. Yeah, right.
Socioeconomic status as well as familial background can also play into admissions for many. Maybe one kid doesn’t have the most promising application, but he’s a legacy, and his dad did just donate a new library to the school. OK, fine, we’ll let him in. Although we may not like to believe it, these situations occur all of the time.
I would like to reiterate that I am in no way accusing Washington and Lee’s Board of Admissions of any of these practices. Rather, I am identifying phenomena that occur on a national scale. Either way, students who find themselves offenders of one of the above situations are less likely to succeed in the long run. Getting in is the easy part; surviving the rigorous academics is the real challenge. Congratulations, how does it feel to be the runt of the litter?
There definitely are some weasels in the class of 2025, but they’re a much more prominent species than you think: they lurk through every class at every school. Test optional or not, there’s no escaping them.
Anon • Jun 23, 2022 at 1:00 pm
Incoming: CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE,
CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE!
Brace yourself, the butthurt mob is here
Anonymous • Dec 22, 2021 at 8:45 pm
Good points. Check this out:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/harvard-ditches-sat-hurts-minority-meritocracy-education-diversity-affirmative-action-asian-black-11640123407?st=d2uunkw06teftnn&reflink=article_email_share
anonymous (Mikel Zahralddin) • Dec 9, 2021 at 6:39 pm
Hmmmmmm. Honestly, I don’t think the fact that he did that means he’s test optional. Perhaps he was a little inebriated (not a sign of test optional) or perhaps he was even trying to do a creative swirl. Or maybe, even more respectable, he was trying to get ice cream as fast as possible and in his attempt to quickly get ice cream you saw him drop it and made fun of him for being “stupid.”
Personally, no offense, I believe you lack creativity in thought. Personally, I love to eat my ice cream in any manner of ways. It’s fun, damnit! Before thanksgiving break I made sure to fill the bottom of the cone. I balanced it, and not a single drop of ice cream spilled but none was also in the conventional cone area.
I’m not saying that you lack creativity entirely, just specifically on this subject; I’m sure you’re a bright student. However, your insight is not only insensitive to this man but also to all ice cream eaters as a whole at our fine community. I’m all for opinion pieces and I apologize if I did offend you, but maybe consider not marginalizing a group of students for the way they applied or how they eat ice cream.
Anonymous • Dec 7, 2021 at 11:12 pm
Last time I checked the admissions office doesn’t care if u worked at Dairy Queen. Just an awful analogy to use to start off an article that is just as bad. College admissions and how to improve it is a serious discussion, and screwing up while making ice cream doesn’t factor into the conversation. Don’t even think it’s necessary to comment on the gross generalizations that you used to describe just under half of the student body. Go take ur ice cream cone and shove it
Coner McGregor • Dec 7, 2021 at 10:57 pm
When I swirl my ice cream I generally use the press approach to avoid any complications. Typically, people attempt to use the carvel approach and swirl the ice cream leaving behind a hollow laconedre hopkins. Instead, the Dairy Queen, mr softee approach is easier for us “imbeciles”. This approach involves the ice cream being under the machine in the same horizontal position until the cone is filled up at which point I will push the ice cream up into the machine creating a thick, solid Lecone James.
Anonymous • Dec 3, 2021 at 7:17 pm
I can say, as a student (who cares about tests at this point goodness me!), I would not have laughed at the ugly joke you made in d-hall. <3 being mean is not cute or funny!
Anonymous • Dec 3, 2021 at 3:27 pm
To the people in the comments that are losing their minds over an (obviously) joking article–How does it feel to exactly prove the point of this author? You have created a one-sided war zone of what seems to be comprised of the most butthurt individuals of ’25; The people who feel like their intelligence is threatened by a label (I’m looking at you, Johnsons!)
Just stop griping over a couple of rhetorical questions and finish reading the article. As the author states themselves, “There [are] definitely some weasels in the class of 2025, but… they lurk through every class at every school. Test optional or NOT, there’s no escaping them.” There are weasels in ’25, ’24, ’23, ’22, and every class before us. It’s just how things work. After all, Daddy’s money will always get his little weasel in, whether they’re test-optional or not.
Anonymous • Dec 5, 2021 at 1:31 am
I understand where you’re coming from, but that doesn’t excuse the rude attitude of this article. Words like imbecile, idiotic?? “How does it feel to be the runt of the litter?” These are not words that should be used to talk about fellow classmates or anyone for that matter. We’re all just trying our best and to get through the day and it doesn’t help when the campus culture means making fun of people in the dining hall. I understand that this is an opinion piece and is respectfully so, but I believe that it could have been phrased in a more polite manner and still have gotten the point across. Lastly, yeah it sucks. There’s always gonna be something that’s unfair or not right in any situation-that’s life, unfortunately. You just gotta focus on yourself and do your best to be kind and uplift others not tear them apart. And finally, we’re all gonna die eventually or we’ll start to lose our memory’s or end up in a nursing home-whatever happens nobody is going to remember any of this, especially the time that one kid dropped his ice cream on the floor. That doesn’t prove anything about being test-optional or not. And to the most basic of lessons to follow, how would you feel if people were laughing and making fun of you over a little scenario…and then publicly wrote about it? Treat others the way you want to be treated, this isn’t elementary school.
anon • Dec 3, 2021 at 9:29 am
standardized testing is not a measure of intelligence, but rather how much testing anxiety you have.
Anonymous • Dec 2, 2021 at 11:37 pm
Hi there!
Woah, it’s really hard to hear you up there on that high horse of yours!
If you could put down your Gucci purse for a moment and do some research, maybe you’ll find that your thinking is deeply flawed.
I’ll preface this by first saying that I wasn’t test-optional; I scored well on my SAT and ACT, and I’m sure that it definitely helped me get in.
However, from my personal experience, I’ve found that the SAT doesn’t test proficiency in math, writing, or reading — what it really tests is one’s ability to understand the format of the SAT.
I used Khan Academy to prepare, but others who require a more one-on-one approach are hard-pressed to find affordable options for tutoring. The average SAT tutor charges $50 an hour, so the road to a higher score is far easier for those coming from higher-income households. So while it’s entirely possible to study independent of a Tutor, it’s still common to buy the books, like those sold by Princeton Review. I urge you to reconsider your approach to this topic.
PS: why are we judging people’s intelligence based on ice cream machine etiquette? I’m a directly-into-mouth kinda guy.
rootin tootin vladamir putin • Dec 8, 2021 at 5:27 pm
Excuse me sir, definitely not ma’am, I do not understand your accent. Please consider a more midwest/neutral tone. Good day.
Sharon • Dec 8, 2021 at 5:29 pm
Directly-into-mouth is against COVID guidelines. Reporting to PubSafe
Anonymous • Dec 2, 2021 at 11:37 pm
makes sense to me
anonymous • Dec 2, 2021 at 10:07 pm
babe…. check your privilege like read your words next time and **think** before you publish
Anonymous • Dec 1, 2021 at 5:42 am
As someone who submitted their test scores, I find this article incredibly close-minded and elitist. Do you really think you’re any better than the student that was able to do well enough academically while maintaining a busy sports schedule? It really sounds like you lack the time management skills that allowed them to be well-rounded, and now you are compensating to make yourself feel better.
Anonymous • Nov 30, 2021 at 11:52 pm
As a “qualified,” test score submitting student, I do not vibe with this
Anonymous • Nov 30, 2021 at 11:14 pm
This is an incredibly elitist attitude towards students that are test optional and assumes that athletes are not smart enough to get in on their own. As a student athlete who had a high gpa and is succeeding at w&l, I find it incredibly demeaning that it should be considered problematic that I am well rounded and can succeed in a variety of situations and circumstances. To me, this article sounds like someone is very annoyed that completely qualified students were admitted to a prestigious academic institution through an alternative method due to extenuating circumstances. I think you need a lesson in humility and I am disappointed that this article is being circulated.
Anonymous • Nov 24, 2021 at 12:25 am
As a Johnson Scholar who applied test-optional, and whose test scores were below the average, your argument fails to understand the complexity and breadth of factors in college admissions. Further, your argument falls flat when you consider the fact that W&L does not even place standardized test scores as one of the most important factors in admissions (per the W&L Common Data Set, page 9). It is also arrogant and elitist to assume that all kids can pay for test prep. More so, simply ascribing a students’ level of quality to a number on a fundamentally flawed test is not in keeping with W&L’s mission of educating the whole person, in all aspects of life, as opposed to simply academic. It seems your contention about test-optional enabling more “unqualified” students to attend W&L has more to do with the admissions office, and who they select to admit, not standardized test themselves. Given you applied test-optional, and after reading this article, it begs me to believe might you be “unqualified” to be attending W&L with a failure to grasp hardly any of the issues that plague the college admissions process. Finally, please stop judging how kids have ice cream, it’s just plain rude, and don’t you have more important things to do. I certainly don’t swirl a Dairy Queen, perfect looking, cone.
Anonymous • Nov 25, 2021 at 6:02 pm
How is the SAT or act hard? Smart people should do well on both. I never had a tutor or even studied for that matter. Just used common sense and got well within w&l’s average score range. Those tests are good equalizers for people who go to rigorous high schools and don’t perfect gpa’s.
Kristina Ayers • Dec 3, 2021 at 5:42 am
Many people aren’t naturally talented at standardized tests and according the test makers at college board and test experts who design prep courses, they quite literally just test how well you can take the test and how well you know the mechanisms of a standardized test- if it was black and white with knowledge vs stupidity do you really think the US among other countries would be moving away from standardized tests? This opinion is so elitist and tone dead- as a Johnson scholar with an above average SAT, I can honestly state that I’m bad at taking standardized test but it doesn’t change the fact that a)
In the top 10% of my incoming class and b) I had the resources to take my sat 3 times and pay for prep resources.